p***@gmail.com
2017-02-09 14:30:53 UTC
(I'd like to compile some data and will post the results later)
I had a 1983 Honda Civic, with a 5 sp. It went ~170k miles without
ever breaking the timing belt. My Uncle's 1986 Buick Park Avenue has
over 100k miles (Automatic), without breaking the timing belt. None
of my friends (work and social) has every broken a timing belt. In
fact, the only sources of broken timing belt stories are: auto-shops,
dealerships, and friend of a friend of a friend who has a broken one
once.
Harley Davidson uses a similar belt to drive its 800 pound motorcycles
in place of a chain. Now if a rubber belt is stong enough to drive a
800 pound bike for usually 10's of thousands of miles, wouldn't you think
it's strong enough to last for a life time when used to drive a couple
of cam shaft, which probably offer resistance equivalent to about 20 pounds?
My theory is that timing belt breaking is a scare story cooked up by
people who want you to spend $2-300 every 60k miles, so that the auto-
service industry can have a few billion dollars more business. After all,
the timing and valves were supposed to be adjusted anyway, why not add one
more item while the valve cover is off.
I want to know if you have had a timing belt broken before, if so,
which car was it (make, model, year, etc), transmission type (which
affects engine rpm), mileage (highway miles, local miles, average
speed), whether you are throttle happy, how high do you rev your
engine before shifting, climate (hot air presumably makes plastic
deteriorate faster), etc. All the variables that you think may
effect the life of a timing belt.
It's important that that you respond even if you have not had a broken
timing belt, especially if your car has gone over the magical 60k mile
mark without replacing the timing belt. Also, please include all cars
in your family so that I can have a big database. Otherwise I will
get only broken timing belt stories.
And please be honest.
you are terribly misinformed and ignorant about engines and cars. There is no conspiracy! Carmakers use belts to save 1,000 per engine and then make interference engines on top of that. The consumer then has to let a mechanic tear his engine apart to replace the belt and pay about 900.00 average (Lexus GX470 about 1500) for the privilege. In short the belt will last anywhere from 60k to 200k depending on how the car is driven and what climate(freeze/thaw cycles) like in Canada or ideal conditions like southern California. In 99% of engines with belts the engine is toast if the belt breaks. Are you willing to risk it because most cars are not worth the 8,000 price to replace the engines. So blame the car makers. The real conspiracy is making engines with belts in the first place. I won't buy a car that has an engine that uses timing belts.I went round and round with VW. They give you a 100,000 mile engine warranty but it specifically EXCLUDES the timing belt which must be changed by VW at 90,000 at a cost of 1100.00 Dollars. ***@gmail.comI had a 1983 Honda Civic, with a 5 sp. It went ~170k miles without
ever breaking the timing belt. My Uncle's 1986 Buick Park Avenue has
over 100k miles (Automatic), without breaking the timing belt. None
of my friends (work and social) has every broken a timing belt. In
fact, the only sources of broken timing belt stories are: auto-shops,
dealerships, and friend of a friend of a friend who has a broken one
once.
Harley Davidson uses a similar belt to drive its 800 pound motorcycles
in place of a chain. Now if a rubber belt is stong enough to drive a
800 pound bike for usually 10's of thousands of miles, wouldn't you think
it's strong enough to last for a life time when used to drive a couple
of cam shaft, which probably offer resistance equivalent to about 20 pounds?
My theory is that timing belt breaking is a scare story cooked up by
people who want you to spend $2-300 every 60k miles, so that the auto-
service industry can have a few billion dollars more business. After all,
the timing and valves were supposed to be adjusted anyway, why not add one
more item while the valve cover is off.
I want to know if you have had a timing belt broken before, if so,
which car was it (make, model, year, etc), transmission type (which
affects engine rpm), mileage (highway miles, local miles, average
speed), whether you are throttle happy, how high do you rev your
engine before shifting, climate (hot air presumably makes plastic
deteriorate faster), etc. All the variables that you think may
effect the life of a timing belt.
It's important that that you respond even if you have not had a broken
timing belt, especially if your car has gone over the magical 60k mile
mark without replacing the timing belt. Also, please include all cars
in your family so that I can have a big database. Otherwise I will
get only broken timing belt stories.
And please be honest.